Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Monster House Smoke LLC et al v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 2:2025cv00204
Plaintiff:
Monster House Smoke LLC doing business as Monster House Dispensary and Lounge, Marc J. Splawn, Sr. and Maggie M. Marble
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces, Ifo Pili, Ismael "Milo" Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DANNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17997
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Loudermilk, et al v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 12-17259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, UNKNOWN PARTIES, MICHAEL DANNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney General for the State of Arizona, RHONDA CASH, individually and in official capacity as a social worker with the Arizona Department of Economic Security, Administration for Children, Youth, Families, Child Protective Services and JENNA CRAMER, individually and in official capacity as a social worker with the Arizona Department of Economic Security, Administration for Children and Families, Child Protective Services
John Loudermilk, et al v. Michael Danner, et al
as 10-15980
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL DANNER, RICHARD GAGNON, JOSHUA RAY and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children
Defendant:
JOSEPH ARPAIO, JULIE RHODES, RHONDA CASH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
