Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THOMAS v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2023cv20777
Plaintiff:
DARIUS LECEAN JOSEPH THOMAS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, BECKY SCOTT, MICHAEL DANTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. SWAT TEAM et al
as 2:2023cv13097
Plaintiff:
CHRIS GRAHAM
Defendant:
SWAT TEAM, THORTON, FRANCINE CIFUENTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
DARIUS THOMAS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OSCAR AVILES, WIENT and MICHAEL DANTICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
RALEIGH GREEN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OSCAR AVILES, MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
NELSON ORTIZ
Defendant:
B. SCOTT, GHEYA CALHOUN-BUTLER, NURSE GODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANTICO et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL DANTICO and FATIMA S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRINSON v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05389
Plaintiff:
MACK N BRINSON
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and MICHAEL DANTICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
MR. EMMANUEL T ANDERSON
Defendant:
MR. OSCAR AVILES, MR. MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05123
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANCIS JONES, III
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04850
Plaintiff:
JAMES K DAWSON
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY & REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
