Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
May v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff: Michael Edward May
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. McInerny et al
as 3:2021cv00348
Defendant: Erin Storm McInerny individually doing business as Pizza on Tap, Michael Edward McInerny individually doing business as Pizza on Tap, Michael Kennon McInerny individually doing business as Pizza on Tap and others
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Chandler v. Beard
as 3:2015cv00734
Petitioner: Michael Edward Chandler
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ottinger v. USA
as 3:2013cv03147
Petitioner: Michael Edward Ottinger, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ottinger v. USA
as 3:2013cv02761
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Edward Ottinger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ermitano v. Tampkins
as 3:2012cv00876
Petitioner: Michael Edward Ermitano
Respondent: C. Y. Tampkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCormack v. Stults et al
as 3:2011cv01685
Plaintiff: Erin Michael McCormack
Defendant: Clifton Robert Stults, Michael Edward Martinez and Bricks and Figs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Equels v. State of California
as 3:2007cv02074
Petitioner: Michael Edward Equels
Respondent: State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01996
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Politzer v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 3:2007cv00457
Plaintiff: Paul Politzer
Defendant: California Highway Patrol, Richard Castillejos and Michael Edwards
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?