Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00556
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) Jones Slaise v. Silveira et al
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Keythan Michael Jones Slaise
Defendant:
Nicole A. Silveira, Kimberly Helms-Lewis, Vernon H. Wranke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones Slaise v. Silveira et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Keythan Michael Jones Slaise
Defendant:
Nicole A. Silveira, Kimberly Helnis-Lewis, Vernon H. Wranke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jones v. KAR Auction Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
KAR Auction Services, Inc., AutoVIN, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(PC) Jones Slaise v. Merced County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Keythan Michael Jones Slaise
Defendant:
Merced County Sheriff, Vernon Warnke, Corey M. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones Slaise v. Merced County Sheriff, et al.
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Keythan Michael Jones Slaise
Defendant:
Merced County Sheriff, Vernon H. Warnke, Corey M. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Jones
as 23-485
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Jones v. USA
as 3:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
Barry Michael Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
