Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rich v. State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv03835
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Samuel Rich and Samuel Guillaume
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Does 1-100, Cyrus Vance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Samuel Rich and Samuel Guillaume
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Cyrus Vance, Jr., State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Virgil et al v. The City Of New York City et al
as 1:2015cv00279
Defendant:
Joell Barnett, City of New York, Sergeant Michael Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Chaka Virgil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shinn v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04892
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Miller and William Reddin
Plaintiff:
Nizam Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05768
Plaintiff:
Diane Dawson and Equasia Whitaker
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe, P.O. Alemtse Clark, P.O. Cindy Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. City of Rutland, VT et al
as 1:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jamek Hart
Defendant:
City of Rutland, VT, Michael Nesshoever, Justin Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis A. Terminello et al. v. The Village of Piermont, New York by its Board of Trustees et al.
as 7:2008cv01056
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Terminello, Michael Miller, Paradise Homeowners Association and others
Defendant:
The Village of Piermont, New York, The Village of Piermont, New York, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doall v. Plumadore et al
as 2:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Denise Doall
Defendant:
Jan Plumadore, Jan Plumadore, Sherrill Spatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
