Cases 31 - 40 of 376
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheng Wen Zhu v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv08533
Respondent:
Lee Baca, Dennis Burns, Michael Chertoff and others
Petitioner:
Cheng Wen Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zaidi v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Farah Zaidi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Aytes, Paul Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00239
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cabugao v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
Nelson S. Cabugao
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, David Still and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Northridge Hospital et al v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Northridge Hospital and Sophia B Molina
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Naqvi v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
Abbas M. Naqvi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Paul Pierre and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
