Cases 31 - 40 of 63
DALEY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROHAN ONEIL DALEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv05040
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04901
Plaintiff:
MAURICE HARPER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABRERA v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv04676
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY, WILLIAM SERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03981
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BLAKE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03895
Plaintiff:
BYRON J. JACKSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAWLEY v. HILL et al
as 2:2013cv03400
Plaintiff:
HOSEA BRAWLEY
Defendant:
ANTHONY HILL, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES H. RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHELTENHAM v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02905
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CHELTEHAM
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSY, NICOLETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARPER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02425
Plaintiff:
MAURICE D. HARPER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, GRACE CHRISTLIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHUR v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv01917
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES J. CUNNINGHAM, A. MEANS RAYFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
