Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith et al v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC, FCI LENDER SERVICES, INC., BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Dispoto v. Opera Tower, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22263
Defendant:
Joseph Arthur, Michael Smith, Dean Warhaft and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dispoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Sean-Michael Smith
as 21-10071
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN-MICHAEL SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Key, et al v. Morehouse College, et al
as 21-10043
Defendant / Appellant:
QUISHA BUGGS, individually, and as Resident Advisor for Morehouse College, MICHAEL HODGES, SHAWN MOORE, individually, and as Associate Coordinator of Resident Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and MICHAEL KEY
Michael Smith v. USA
as 20-12626
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Smith v. Crisp Regional Hospital, Inc., et al
as 19-12225
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISP REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH, as next friend of MS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Credit One Bank N.A.
as 5:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Credit One Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
