Cases 1 - 7 of 7
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. et al
as 1:2012cv05373
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , ATLANTIC COUNTY and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC. , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1464
Huang v. Tine
as 11-2476
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
Huang v. Tine
as 11-889
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
Huang v. Tine
as 11-806
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
Huang v. Tine
as 10-3738
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
NEW JERSEY SAND HILL BAND OF LENAPE AND CHEROKEE INDIANS et al v. DE FACTO STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv00683
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY SAND HILL BAND OF LENAPE AND CHEROKEE INDIANS and RONALD STACEY
Respondent:
DE FACTO STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JON CORZINE, NINA WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
K.U. et al v. JAMESBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2007cv01627
Plaintiff:
K.U., R.U. and V.U.
Defendant:
JAMESBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION and MIDDLESEX COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
