Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Miguel Diaz v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 14-16986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, Warden, J. REYNOSSO, Associate Warden, R. GARCIA, CC II and others
Miguel Diaz v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 14-16520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, Warden, V. RAMIREZ, HALL and others
Miguel Diaz v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-72668
:
In re: MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Petitioner:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
R. DIAZ, Warden, J. REYNOSSO, Associate Warden, R. GARCIA, CC II and others
Miguel Diaz v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-16328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, P. VERA, Associate Warden, VASQUEZ, Capt. and others
Miguel Diaz v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 13-16318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Warden, K. YOUNG, Associate Warden, RIVAS, CCII and others
Miguel Diaz v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-80230
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Respondent:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of CDCR, RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, P. VERA, Associate Warden and others
Miguel Diaz v. USDC-CAFR
as 12-74012
:
In re: MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Petitioner:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE
Miguel E. Diaz v. Diaz et al
as 1:2012cv01296
Plaintiff:
Miguel E. Diaz
Defendant:
R. Diaz, J. Reynoso, R. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Miguel Diaz v. Vasquez, et al
as 12-16238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
VASQUEZ, Capt., R. MORALES, J. GALLAGHER and others
Miguel Diaz v. McCue, et al
as 12-15367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCUE, LORI AUSTIN and HSHIEH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
