Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Morel v. Thies et al
as 0:2018cv61980
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL, Department of Children and Families, JULIE L JONES and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Morel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKER v. CARROLL et al
as 4:2018cv00377
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HOOKER
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL, RICKY RENARD WYCHE, LATRELLE FAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Pepke v. Florida Department of Families
as 0:2018cv60432
Plaintiff:
Randolph Scott Pepke, Jr
Defendant:
Florida Department of Families , Center for Family and Child Enrichment, Inc. , Belia Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
G et al v. CARROLL
as 4:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
H G , M G , C P and others
Defendant:
MIKE CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv24047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754 Discrimination
William Overcash, et al v. Mark Shelnutt, et al
as 17-13721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM TODD OVERCASH, an individual
Interested Party - Appellant:
HENRY GEORGE FERRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK D. SHELNUTT, an individual, MARK D. SHELNUTT, P.A., LORI A. FOULTZ, an individual and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberic Israel v. Department of Children and Fam, et al
as 17-10427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERIC ISRAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, KAVAJA SARDUY, Case Manager, Department of Children and Families and MIKE CARROLL, Head Executive, Department of Children and Families
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
