Cases 1 - 10 of 109
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LAURENT MILLER v. EXPEDIA GROUP et al
as 1:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
EXPEDIA GROUP, FONTIER AIRLINES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LAURENT MILLER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS and NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
MILLER-EVANS v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLER-EVANS
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and BRYAN KASUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MILLER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
