Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv02005
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Roxann Christine Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv04060
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Lee Miller
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv04008
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melise Miller
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Tena L. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Paula K Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Theresa Berdine Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv04045
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Lee Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv02028
Plaintiff:
Steven W Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Carrie Mae Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
