Cases 1 - 10 of 460
Watterson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00732
Petitioner:
Elijah Watterson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipska v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Lipska and Christopher Ray Hare
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
William Thompson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornsberry v. Roberts et al
as 6:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Jacobi Broshawn Thornsberry
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Heidi Miller, Katie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rev. Patrick Hugh Ronald Morrison
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Heidi Steward, Jammie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Green v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael Green
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
