Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ROJAS et al v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 1:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
EDWIN L. ROJAS and PLAN B NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L. et al v. NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
KRISTI L., T. L., CHRISTINA MILLS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM, CHRISTOPHER BROWNE, OFFICE OF PROTECTION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ADESHINA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
YINKA ADESHINA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL J. CLINTON, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS, JERRY JACKSON, BURR ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NELLSON v. U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00788
Defendant:
GREGORY MIMS, KATHRYN ARRINGTON, PHILIP HLAVAC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NELLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KAYIJI v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MAKAU KAYIJI
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, STEPHANIE MILLER, JOSEPH OH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MILLS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01134
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , KELLENE DAVIS , GEORGE R MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
MARIE N. MILLS and MEDRIC C. MILLS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
