Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Kennedy v. Primecare Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Shane Kennedy
Defendant:
Primecare Medical, Inc., York County Prison, York County Prison Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mink v. Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
John M. Mink
Defendant:
Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc., Hogan Dedicated Services, LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Koch v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01761
Plaintiff:
Michael William Koch
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Andrew Edilinger and Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford v. While et al
as 1:2014cv01682
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Crawford
Defendant:
While, Shermon, Debra Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Milhouse v. Sage et al
as 1:2014cv01055
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
Jessica Sage, Holtzaple, J. E. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Mink
as 1:2013cv02836
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houston et al v. Mink et al
as 4:2013cv01930
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston and Edward McDonald
Defendant:
D Mink, K. Rapp, Jeff Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chandler v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Lawrence Karpen and Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chandler v. Mink et al
as 1:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Danielle Mink, Kent Cannon and Lawrence Karpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
