Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00569
Petitioner: MIRANDA ROGERS
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
EDMUNDSON et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff: MELANIE F. EDMUNDSON, MIRANDA S. TODD, PAMELA C. TODD PITTS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Miranda v. McDonough
as 21-2258
Claimant: JOHN J. MIRANDA
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Bell v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESUS GAMEZ, PHILIP JONES, FRANCISCO PEREZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Bell v. US
as 20-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD BENAVIDES, FRANCISCO PEREZ, MELITON CORDERO and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
MIRANDA et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00776
Petitioner: MARIA MIRANDA and ADRIAN MIRANDA
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
OMON et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00699
Petitioner: MIRANDA E OMON and EDEM A OMON
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
HADDAD et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00626
Petitioner: LESLIE HADDAD , MICHAEL HADDAD and MIRANDA HADDAD
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
FOSTER et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00280
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C. FOSTER , DANIEL HARDING , JASMINE S. JOHNSON and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
CLEMENTS et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00662
Petitioner: MIRANDA CLEMENTS and GABRIEL LOCKLEAR
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?