Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BRADSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19724
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL BRADSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 1:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
James Hairston
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Hairston
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Law Enforcement Unit, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Bennett v. TN Dept Of Corrections, et al
as 14-6025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
TN DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, INVESTIGATIONS AND COMPLIANCE, ET AL UNIT, JONATHAN FLAKE and others
Corey Bennett v. Geneva Roberts, et al
as 14-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GENEVA ROBERTS, MICHAEL DONAHUE, MITCHELL BRADSHAW and others
Bennett v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Davis, Crowder, James Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Roberts et al
as 1:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Geneva Roberts, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
