Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cargill v. ARB, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv08842
Defendant:
Getty Oil Company, Hood Corporation, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP and others
Plaintiff:
David Cargill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Houston v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019at00066
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a Alliedsignal Inc., as success-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation, The Boeing Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dero Maples v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2016cv03576
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, 3M Company, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dero Maples, Jr
Johnson et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2012cv03678
Plaintiff:
Elvira B. Johnson , Lynsie D. Johnson , Jeff London and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Amcord, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwin Daniel Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2010cv08513
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Daniel Jones and Virginia Jones
Lyman et al v. Asbestos Defendants (B*P) et al
as 4:2007cv04240
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Lyman, Robert F. Lyman, Robert F. Lyman and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, Montello Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (c) R&R re motions for abstention (non-core)
Lyman et al v. Asbestos Defendants (B*P) et al
as 3:2007cv04240
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Lyman, Robert F. Lyman, Robert F. Lyman and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, Montello Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (c) R&R re motions for abstention (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
