Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COULIBALY v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA et al
as 1:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
TIEMOKO COULIBALY
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), NRT MID ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUERTAS et al v. WARD et al
as 1:2019cv02570
Defendant:
MD M.C.S.O. EVICTION UNIT, STATE OF MARYLAND INC., JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ELSA HUERTAS and PABLO HUERTAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMISSE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS
as 1:2019cv02215
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. DEMISSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
as 1:2018cv02467
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRIAN MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERAMUS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION et al
as 1:2018cv01486
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DERAMUS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION and MONTGOMERY COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLAGBEGI v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
GREGORY O. OLAGBEGI
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY , MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , BONDURI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DEMERY et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND et al
as 1:2008cv01304
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MANUEL DEMERY, TIJUANA DARLENE DEMERY and WAYNE MABRY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and KATHERINE FUMAGALLI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SLOVINEC v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY , MARYLAND
as 1:2007cv01655
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SLOVINEC
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY , MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
