Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Karen Amesbury, et al v. CSA, et al
as 13-1624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN AMESBURY, Executrix of the estate of Brian Mark Patton, Deceased, AMY B. PATTON, his wife, CHARLES B. MORGAN, Co-Guardian of David Morgan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CSA, LTD., COMBAT SUPPORT ASSOCIATES, AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC and others
Defendant:
SMI INTERNATIONAL, CORP
Karen Amesbury, et al v. CSA, et al
as 13-8024
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KAREN AMESBURY, Executrix of the estate of Brian Mark Patton, Deceased, AMY B. PATTON, his wife, MARGARET A. MORGAN, Co-Guardian of David Morgan and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CSA, LTD., COMBAT SUPPORT ASSOCIATES, AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC and others
Defendant:
SMI INTERNATIONAL, CORP
Karen Amesbury, et al v. CSA, et al
as 13-1484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN AMESBURY, Executrix of the estate of Brian Mark Patton, Deceased, AMY B. PATTON, his wife, MARGARET A. MORGAN, Co-Guardian of David Morgan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MORGAN LEE HANKS, CSA, LTD., COMBAT SUPPORT ASSOCIATES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SMI INTERNATIONAL, CORP
Karen Amesbury, et al v. CSA, et al
as 13-1441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN AMESBURY, Executrix of the estate of Brian Mark Patton, Deceased, AMY B. PATTON, his wife, MARGARET A. MORGAN, Co-Guardian of David Morgan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CSA, LTD., COMBAT SUPPORT ASSOCIATES, AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN LEE HANKS and ALEUT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Morgan v. CSA, Ltd. Combat Support Associates et al
as 3:2010cv01999
Plaintiff:
David Morgan
Defendant:
CSA, Ltd. Combat Support Associates, AECOM Government Services, Inc., Research Analysis & Maintenance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amesbury et al v. CSA, Ltd. et al
as 3:2010cv01712
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Amesbury and Amy Beth Patton
Defendant:
CSA, Ltd., Combat Support Associates, AECOM Government Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
