Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Morris v. USA
as 2:2010cv02289
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William A. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morris v. Bolgreen et al
as 5:2009cv03240
Plaintiff:
James Morris
Defendant:
Josie Bolgreen and Staffmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Larve et al
as 5:2009cv03177
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Howard
Defendant:
(fnu) Larve, Chris Morris and Lisa Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brannan v. Morris County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2009cv03173
Plaintiff:
John W. Brannan
Defendant:
Morris County Board of Commissioners, Morris County Sheriff, Council Grove Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2009cv03097
Petitioner:
Morris Williams
Respondent:
Roger Werholtz and Steve Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Baird et al
as 5:2008cv03059
Petitioner:
Joe Floyd Fuller, Sr
Respondent:
Ted Baird, State of Kansas and Paul Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Houten v. Morris et al
as 5:2008cv03023
Plaintiff:
James E. Van Houten
Defendant:
Deanna Morris and Wanda Bokor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Houten v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03012
Plaintiff:
James E Van Houten
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, (fnu) Heimegardner, (fnu) Dragoo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Texaco Star Mart et al
as 5:2007cv03181
Plaintiff:
Morris Williams
Defendant:
Texaco Star Mart, Dewayne Ingold, Thomas Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Caldwell County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2007cv03131
Plaintiff:
Steven Leroy Morris
Defendant:
Caldwell County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
