Cases 1 - 10 of 35
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
STEVE A MORRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. CROWDER
as 5:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MATTHEW B CROWDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Crowder
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Mims Michael Morris and Mims Michael Morris, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew B. Crowder
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 6:2021cv00051
Petitioner:
Steve A. Morris
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bey v. Salinas et al
as 1:2021cv03260
Petitioner:
Joell Mustafa Bey and Joell Tremayne Howard
Respondent:
Catherine M. Salinas, James N. Hatten, Michael S. Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 6:2020cv00064
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Steve A. Morris
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00227
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
DR STEVE A MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2020cv02139
Petitioner:
WILLIE JERMAINE MORRIS
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00129
Petitioner:
WILLIE JERMAINE MORRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
