Cases 11 - 20 of 186
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MPOY v. JOHN BURST et al
as 1:2023cv03027
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY
Defendant:
JOHN BURST, DONIELLE POWE and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Charles Inko-Tariah v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 23-7103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah
Defendant / Appellee:
Muriel Bowser and Kevin Vorndran
CHERRY-EL v. BLOUNT et al
as 1:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
DWANE CHERRY-EL
Defendant:
BELINDA BLOUNT, LAKISHA POOLER, MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
INKO-TARIAH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv01664
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and KEVIN VORNDRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louis Banks, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 23-5125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louis A. Banks and DB, a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Education, District of Columbia, Municipality Committee on Public Works Operations and others
BANKS et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. BANKS and DB
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MUNICIPALITY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
