Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WHALEN v. USA
as 1:2022cv00413
Petitioner:
ARCHIE MURPHY WHALEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MURPHY v. BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DANA LNU and PATTI LNU
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. BOBROW et al
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
DAVID J BOBROW and BRENDAN O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv00396
Plaintiff:
ADAM S MURPHY
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL and CRAIG CLOSSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
ADAM S MURPHY
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL and CRAIG CLOSSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRACY v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
PAUL DAVID TRACY
Respondent:
MICHAELA MURPHY, NORMAN CROTEAU and ANDREW ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MAINE, STATE OF
as 2:2012cv00372
Petitioner:
CAROL MURPHY
Respondent:
MAINE, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. CORIZON et al
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
CORIZON, RICH HALLWORTH, KEN TOPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
ANDREW P FLOOD
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH PONTE, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
