Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gomez v. City of Canton Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
Omar R. Gomez
Defendant:
City of Canton Police Department, Detective Michael Walker, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Grove et al
as 3:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Murphy
Defendant:
Sgt. Grove, C/O White and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Black
as 1:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
Allen Murphy
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, et al.
as 4:2022cv01936
Plaintiff:
Frank D Murphy and Frank D. Murphy
Defendant:
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio
as 3:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Defendant:
Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey, Jr. v. Murphy et al
as 3:2020cv02679
Defendant:
Belal A. Tawil, Officer L. Nitkiewicz, Officer Paul Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rooseveltt Dorsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
as 3:2020cv02103
Defendant:
Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Reeves
as 3:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Officer Trevaun Reeves
Plaintiff:
Jayson Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. State of Ohio
as 5:2019cv00963
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Murphy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
