Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Misa et al
as 3:2012cv01645
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Misa, Conrad Murphy and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sherrie Kramer et al v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv07079
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Does and Rosalinda Murphy
Plaintiff:
Philip Kramer and Sherrie Kramer
Murphy v. The Lesley Foundation
as 3:2011cv01845
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
The Lesley Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patricia Murphy et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00514
Defendant:
Doe and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Murphy and Robert Murphy
Murphy, et al v. CTX Mortgage, et al
as 2:2010at00761
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy and Julie Hendrix
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and Fortress Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Murphy, et al v. CTX Mortgage, et al
as 2:2010cv01435
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy and Julie Hendrix
Defendant:
CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and Fortress Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Kenneth Bain et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 8:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Gwen Bain, Kenneth Bain, Brian Bermudes and others
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Murphy v. R Q Contruction, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
James P Murphy
Defendant:
R Q Construction, Inc , Continental Casualty Company and Does
Counter_claimant:
R Q Construction, Inc
Counter_defendant:
James P Murphy
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Murphy v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
