Cases 1 - 10 of 137
CELGENE CORPORATION et al v. PRIME THERAPEUTICS LLC
as 2:2024cv04479
Petitioner:
CELGENE CORPORATION and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Respondent:
PRIME THERAPEUTICS LLC
Celgene Corporation et al v. Prime Therapeutics LLC
as 1:2024mc00131
Petitioner:
Celgene Corporation and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Respondent:
Prime Therapeutics LLC
Wright v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mayo Clinic et al v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv22321
Plaintiff:
Mayo Clinic and Lifepoint Corporate Services, General Partnership
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH, INC. v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv22117
Plaintiff:
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH, INC.
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lawrence v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Kent v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc., Mike Pykosz, Geoffrey Price and others
O'Neill v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
