Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MYERS v. NATIONAL DCP, LLC
as 1:2021cv13758
Plaintiff:
PAUL MYERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL DCP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY v. FASMAN et al
as 3:2020cv02924
Defendant:
TYLER P. FASMAN and JOHN J. PISANO, ESQ.
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MCCALLUM v. PROACTIVE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv20932
Defendant:
GreenRG Management, Alfred Heyer, Jr, Proactive Lighting Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur McCallum and MARK MCCALLUM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
MONTGOMERY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.
as 3:2019cv19948
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. et al
as 2:2017cv03527
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Plaintiff:
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LESKO v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
as 3:2016cv04427
Plaintiff:
JOHN LESKO
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHAUTE v. BRISTOL, MYERS, SQUIBB et al
as 3:2016cv04186
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SHAUTE
Defendant:
BRISTOL, MYERS, SQUIBB , JLL, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PATIENT CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv02460
Plaintiff:
PATIENT CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and ABC CORP. (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SAC v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv04178
Plaintiff:
ANNA SAC
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and KATHERINE R. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GUILFOY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv03877
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GUILFOY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and ELLIOTT SIGEL & PETER DIROCCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
