Cases 31 - 40 of 57
United States of America v. Maddox
as 1:2016cv10190
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shanta Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hammond v. Maddox et al
as 3:2016cv03145
Plaintiff:
Shad Hammond
Defendant:
. Maddox, Butler, Don Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
Mannie Maddox
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Paul Talbot, Mary Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John P. Ware et al v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
John P Ware , Andrew L Waters , Toleda Waters and others
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. , Abbott Laboratories Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stoller et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller and Michael Stoller
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ferguson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Roderick Maddox, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSON et al v. TIMOTHY et al
as 1:2015cv07390
Plaintiff:
NAIROBI HENSON and MADDOX DAVID
Defendant:
COOPER TIMOTHY and Chicago Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Marshall v. Maddox
as 3:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Marqnkie D. Marshall
Defendant:
R. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
