Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Madrigal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Richard Madrigal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Madrigal v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrigal
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Madrigal v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv04979
Plaintiff:
Fernando Madrigal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Madrigal, et al
as 3:2016cv02176
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Linda V. Madrigal, Rita Madrigal Ramirez and Eggleston Meinert & Pavley Funeral Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02314
Plaintiff:
Christina Madrigal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Madrigal et al
as 5:2010cv01209
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rafael Madrigal, Raul Mejia, Eleuterio Maddieal and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Madrigal v. Welch
as 3:2010cv00638
Petitioner:
Jamie Rydale Madrigal
Respondent:
Robert Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amantea et al v. IPOF, LP
as 1:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Amantea, Carmen P. Arrigo, Jeffrey H. Berry and others
Defendant:
IPOF, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Amantea et al v. Innotrac, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03542
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Amantea, Carmen P. Arrigo, Jeffrey H. Berry and others
Defendant:
Innotrac, Inc., Scott Dorfman, David L. Gansey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
