Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Moshir v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2017cv01317
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Sgt. Sullivan, Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 4:2017cv01106
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, USMS, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Mahoning County Sheriff et al
as 4:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Darryl Adams
Defendant:
Mahoning County Sheriff and John and Jane Does and/or Entity Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Mahoning County Jail
as 4:2016cv02959
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ann Clark
Defendant:
Mahoning County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. Doherty et al
as 4:2016cv02173
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dumas
Defendant:
Rebecca Doherty, Jennifer McLaughlin, Mark Carfolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. Christian et al
as 4:2016cv01705
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dumas
Defendant:
Shirley J. Christian and Mahoning County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tribble v. Mahoning County, Ohio et al
as 4:2016cv01256
Plaintiff:
James C. Tribble
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Ohio, Mahoning County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail, et al
as 16-3495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN M. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAHONING COUNTY JAIL, In their official capacity, SHERIFF RANDALL A. WELLINGTON, LIEUTENANT STEVE SZEKLEY and others
Jones v. Warden Grafton Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2015cv01158
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Grafton Correctional Institution, State of Ohio, Mahoning County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Holmes, Jr. et al.
as 4:2015cv01085
Defendant:
Sherod D. Holmes, Jr., Dawn M DiBenardi , John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvenn D Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
