Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calcano v. Vineyard Vines, LLC
as 20-2642
Defendant / Appellee:
Vineyard Vines, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcos Calcano, On Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated
Calcano v. The Art of Shaving-FL, LLC
as 20-1594
Defendant / Appellee:
The Art of Shaving-FL, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcos Calcano, On behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Calcano v. Swarovski North America Limite
as 20-1552
Defendant / Appellee:
Swarovski North America Limited
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcos Calcano, On behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Mendez v. AnnTaylor, Inc.
as 20-1550
Defendant / Appellee:
AnnTaylor, Inc., The Art of Shaving-FL, LLC, Jersey Mike's Franchise Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Himelda Mendez, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Braulio Thorne, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Yovanny Dominguez, on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
