Cases filed in Rhode Island
Buhler et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2013cv00295
Plaintiff: Jeffrey R. Buhler and Marion C. Buhler
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BEACH et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv03173
Plaintiff: KELLY BEACH and MARION BEACH
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tompkins v. Textron Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00440
Plaintiff: Marion L. Tompkins and Marion L. Tompkins
Defendant: Textron Inc., Lewis B. Campbell, Terrence O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Evans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02890
Plaintiff: Allan Evans
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Respondent: Rodney Miller, Southern Illinois Healthcare and Marion Hospital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Forte et al
as 1:2009mc00037
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant: Joseph S. Forte and Joseph Forte, L.P.
Receiver: Marion Hecht
Bradshaw v. New England Gas Co., Inc
as 1:2008cv00821
Plaintiff: Marion Bradshaw, Marion Bradshaw and Marion Bradshaw
Defendant: New England Gas Co., Inc, New England Gas Co., Inc, New England Gas Co., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property Both
Teague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02342
Plaintiff: Marion Teague
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Chao v. Shoreham, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00120
Plaintiff: Elaine L. Chao
Defendant: Shoreham, Inc, Shoreham, Inc, Shoreham, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?