Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON HOSPITAL, ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL, AULTMAN HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BAXTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03091
Plaintiff:
BAXTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER, CALDWELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS HIGHLANDS HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv02453
Plaintiff:
ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS HIGHLANDS HOSPITAL, BAXTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv03617
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, MCLAREN PORT HURON HOSPITAL, RMC ANNISTON and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01386
Plaintiff:
HENRY COUNTY HEALTH, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS, HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv01756
Plaintiff:
KING'S DAUGHTERS' HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES, CENTEGRA HOSPITAL - WOODSTOCK, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02749
Plaintiff:
PROMEDICA BIXBY HOSPITAL, PALMETTO HEALTH EASLEY, SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
