Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Boulton v. Cook County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Plaintiff: Stephen F Boulton and Stephen F. Boulton
Defendant: COOK COUNTY CLERK OF COOK COUNTY, Karen A Yarbrough, in her officially capacity as Cook County Clerk, Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. City of Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2022cv04577
Plaintiff: Willie Wilson, Robert Fioretti, Earl C. Williams and others
Defendant: City of Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Marisel A. Hernandez, William J. Kresse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Libertarian Party of Illinois et al v. Yarbrough, in her officially capacity as Cook County Clerk et al
as 1:2022cv00578
Plaintiff: Libertarian Party of Illinois, Steve Suess, Justin Tucker and others
Defendant: Karen A Yarbrough, in her officially capacity as Cook County Clerk, Chicago Board of Elections, Marisel A. Hernandez and others
Intervenor: Illinois Green Party, Richard Giovanni and Rita Maniotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrea Raila v. David Orr, et al
as 21-3275
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREA RAILA
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID D. ORR, CHRISTOPHER J. AGRELLA, COOK COUNTY OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD, and its Members and others
Cook County Republican Party v. Pritzker, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04676
Defendant: William J. Kresse, Marisel A. Hernandez, Karen A. Yabrough and others
Plaintiff: Cook County Republican Party
Intervenor Defendant: DCCC
Amicus Curiae: Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Illinois Public Interest Research Group, Chicago Votes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook County Republican Party et al v. Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv06598
Plaintiff: Cook County Republican Party and Chicago Republican Party
Defendant: Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago , Marisel A Hernandez , William Kresse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Rose v. Board of Election Commissioner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT ROSE
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS FOR THE CITY OF CHICAGO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, through Lisa Madigan Attorney General, LANGDON D. NEAL, Chairman and others
Rose v. The Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00382
Plaintiff: Vincent Rose
Defendant: The Board of Election Commissioners For The City of Chicago, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff: Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant: Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Anthony Navarro, et al v. Langdon Neal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3572
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY P. NAVARRO, DAVID B. NAVARRO, SCOTT CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellee: LANGDON D. NEAL, Member of the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity, RICHARD A. COWEN, Member of the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity and MARISEL A. HERNANDEZ, Member of the Board of Election Commissioner for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?