Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Anonymous Human Rights Activist v. Rangel et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Anonymous Human Rights Activist
Defendant:
P. Rangel, Szemborki, Debra Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Christopher Synsvoll, Mark Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mallett v. Wiley et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Dawane Mallett
Defendant:
Ron Wiley, Mark Collins and Harly Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mallett v. Wiley et al
as 1:2009cv02888
Plaintiff:
Dawane Mallett
Defendant:
Ron Wiley, Mark Collins and Harly Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Ron Wiley, Robert Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Manley et al
as 1:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Shawn P. Williams
Defendant:
John P. Manley, T. Beal, J. Cabel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2008cv02572
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Robert M. Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Twitty v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv00688
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Ronnie Wiley, Jones, D. J. Krist and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fountain v. Batulis et al
as 1:2008cv00629
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Fountain
Defendant:
Barbara Batulis, Barbara (I) Batulis, M. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
