Cases 11 - 20 of 570
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
C. Bailey, Donald Davis and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUFFIN v. DIXON
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RUFFIN
Respondent:
MARK INCH and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Cicarrno et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews
Defendant:
Sgt. Cicarrno, M. Herring, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESOLEK v. DIXON et al
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A WESOLEK, STEVEN A. MATHIS and STEVEN ALLAN WESOLEK
Defendant:
MARK INCH, SCOTT DUVALL, JEFFREY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesolek v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Wesolek and Steven A. Mathis
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Scott Duvall, Jeffrey Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK AUNTAE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, MICHEAL ZAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2022cv22015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BAILEY
Defendant:
L RODRIGUEZ, BURDETT, AGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Florida State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, Mark Inch, Warden Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
