Cases 51 - 60 of 570
Casey v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Morris, R. Starling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore and Tugaya Shabaka
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Mark Inch, M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAEZ v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv14004
Plaintiff:
JA'QUAN SAEZ
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Ashley Moody and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LANE, JOHN DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAEZ v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00512
Petitioner:
JA'QUAN SAEZ
Respondent:
MARK INCH and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JEFFERSON v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv24367
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B JEFFERSON
Defendant:
Mark Inch and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas Jackson v. Mark Inch, et al
as 21-14351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK INCH, Individual and Official Capacity as Secretary, J. BALDRIDGE, Individual and Official Capacity as Warden, R SCHMITT, Individual and Official Capacity as Assistant Warden and others
JEFFERSON v. INCH
as 4:2021cv00497
Petitioner:
TERRENCE B JEFFERSON
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Solomon v. Henson et al
as 2:2021cv14465
Plaintiff:
Rico Dontay Solomon
Defendant:
Mr. Henson, Mr. Rodgers, Austinlee Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. GUILFORD et al
as 5:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A JACKSON
Defendant:
MR GUILFORD, A BAILEY, MS SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
