Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 20-55688
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PAUL M. NAKASONE, Department of Defense, National Security Agency, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
State of Washington v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-35371
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 20-70365
Petitioner: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Not Classified By Court: CATHRINE SCHMID, PHILLIP STEPHENS, GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 20-55111
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17501
Defendant / Appellant: STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
ALDF, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-35708
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SARAH BEXELL, on behalf of Future Generations, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, a nonprofit organization, CODY SHOTOLA-SCHIEWE and others
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16336
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Amicus Curiae: ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FEDERAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE, DUANE MORELY COX, TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?