Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Williams v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Young, Walker and Pope Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dade Correctional Institution, Colonel et al
as 1:2020cv23860
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution, Colonel, Dade Correctional Institution, Sergeant Johnson, Dade Correctional Institution, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dade Correctional Institution, Sergeant et al
as 1:2020cv23866
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution, Sergeant and Dade Correctional Institution, Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2019cv01436
Petitioner:
Mark Williams
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2018cv01410
Petitioner:
Mark Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00849
Petitioner:
Mark Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dinkens v. Murphy
as 3:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
Enoch E. Dinkens, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark William Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 5:2016cv00095
Petitioner:
Mark Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Duncan et al
as 3:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Duncan and Espitio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuzara v. Pippin et al
as 5:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kuzara
Defendant:
L Pippin and FNU Edelen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
