Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Simmonds v. Marriott International Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00752
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Simmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hancock v. Marriott International Inc
as 3:2016cv03311
Plaintiff:
Karen Hancock
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marti v. Marriott International Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Janet Marie Marti
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc, Operadora Marriott SA DE CV, Marriott Hotels SA DE CV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chenanda v. Marriott International Inc
as 3:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nanjappa Chenanda
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentley v. Marriott International Inc
as 3:2015cv01412
Plaintiff:
Estate of Thomas E Bentley
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olson et al v. Travelocity.com LP et al
as 3:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Lisa E Olson and Newton B Schwartz, Sr.
Defendant:
Travelocity.com LP, Sabre Holdings Corporation, Priceline.com Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thompson v. Booking.com B.V. et al
as 3:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Booking.com B.V., Booking.com (USA) Inc, Expedia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Murray v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Bruce Murray
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc, Expedia Inc, Hotels.com LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
