Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. et al v. THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
as 0:2023cv62119
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., OAKLEY, INC. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant: THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, jutuibox.com, xpsclothing.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Luxottica Group S.p.A. S.p.A. et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2023cv61701
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., OAKLEY, INC. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant: The Individuals, Business Entities And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, Bage Garment Factory, Baibian Glasses and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Luxottica Group S.P.A. et al v. Beemer & Associates III, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00551
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.P.A., Oakley, Inc. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant: Beemer & Associates III, LLC, Atlantic Self Storage, LLC, Mahmoud Ashourian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
as 0:2022cv62231
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., OAKLEY, INC. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant: The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations, behc, COCOLUXURY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Troy Smith, et al v. Mitchell Miorelli, et al
as 22-10663
Plaintiff / Appellee: TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party: MITCHELL GEORGE MIORELLI, AUSTIN VALLS and JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Troy Smith, et al v. John Davis, et al
as 22-10667
Plaintiff / Appellee: TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party: JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Troy Smith, et al v. Austin Valls, et al
as 22-10666
Plaintiff / Appellee: TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party: AUSTIN VALLS
Defendant / Appellee: COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
as 0:2022cv60121
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Defendant: The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Luxottica Group S.p.A., et al v. blingbling-eyes.com
as 22-10205
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A., OAKLEY, INC. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: BLINGBLING-EYES.COM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?