Cases 21 - 30 of 44
MARSHALL V USPS
as 10-3128
Petitioner:
Douglas S. Marshall, Douglas S. Marshall, Douglas S. Marshall and others
Respondent:
United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service and others
MARTIN et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00809
Petitioner:
GABRIELLE MARTIN and BREANNA MARSHALL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
MARSHALL v. USA
as 1:2009cv00733
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE V US
as 09-5084
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Benjamin Branham, Jr., Clifford Lyle Marshall, Danielle Vigil-Masten and others
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee:
United States
Third Party Defendant-Appellee:
Yurok Tribe
MARSHALL-MOSBY V USPS
as 09-3093
Petitioner:
Jewel Marshall-Mosby
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
MARSHALL V HHS
as 09-3086
Amicus Curiae:
Chief Warrant & Warrant Officers Association, USCG, Fleet Reserve Association, Military Officers Association of America and others
Respondent:
Department of Health and Human Services
Petitioner:
Raymond Marshall
MARSHALL V US
as 08-5121
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Larry A. Marshall and Mary S. Lemieux Marshall
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
TAFAS V KAPPOS
as 08-1352
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association and others
Defendant-Appellant:
David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC and others
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
FLOWERS V US
as 08-5052
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Marshall Kenneth Flowers
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
MARSHALL V BALLARD MEDICAL
as 07-1246
Defendant-Appellant:
Ballard Medical Products
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Barry James Marshall and Medquest Pty Ltd. (as trustee for the Clotest Trust)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
