Cases 21 - 30 of 265
Bailey v. Eugene Lusega/DDBUS LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Marshall T. Bailey
Defendant:
Eugene Lusega/DDBUS LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust, Ocwen Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Marshall WilliamsIn re: Marshall Williams
as 23-11239
Petitioner:
In re: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
David RatcliffIn re: David Ratcliff
as 23-11140
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID MARC RATCLIFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Marshall v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 7:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Kenyaques Marshall
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARSHALL v. NELNET et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
NELNET, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARSHALL v. CAPITAL ACCOUNTS et al
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARESHALL and KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS, EXPERIAN and EQUIFAX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MARSHALL v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL et al
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARESHALL and KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, TRANSUNION and EXPERIAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Howell-Fedorov et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 9:2023cv80095
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell-Fedorov and Damon Fedorov-Howell-Karriem
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Law Office of Marshall C. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
