Cases 21 - 30 of 62
ASSAD v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ASSAD
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION , J. RICH ALEXANDER , RANDALL S. DEARTH and others
Mediator:
ARTHUR H. STROYD
Plaintiff_consolidated:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MARSHALL v. COMMUNICATIONS TEST DESIGN, INC.
as 2:2017cv04383
Plaintiff:
DEREK MARSHALL
Defendant:
COMMUNICATIONS TEST DESIGN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BANKS v. SONG
as 2:2017mc00674
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FRANCES E. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA et al v. MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2016mc00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and NOON BEAR
Defendant:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
BANKS v. HICKTON et al
as 2:2015mc00885
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DAVID HICKTON, ROBERT CESSAR, JUDGE MARK HORNAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
