Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Taylor v. Cook
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Marshall Scott Taylor
Respondent:
Lee Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boston v. US Marshals et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Petitioner:
Gregory Earl Boston
Defendant:
United States Marshals
Respondent:
US Marshals and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boston v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Gregory Earl Boston
Respondent:
USA and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Quintana-Speas v. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Carlito Quintana-Speas
Defendant:
Hector Rios, FNU Simmons, Head of Classification OCPF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Hampton et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
S. Hampton, United States Marshal Service and United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. United States Attorneys Office et al
as 1:2021cv00904
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
United States Attorneys Office, U.S. Marshals Service and Albuquerque Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Albuquerque Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
Albuquerque Police Department and United States Marshals' Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. United States Marshals Office et al
as 1:2021cv00835
Plaintiff:
Laroy Leon Jamar Taylor
Defendant:
United States Marshals Office and FNU Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bandy v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 1:2020cv01000
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Chris Bandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
