Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Marshall, Jr. v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
Cottrell Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Juanito Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Toledo Police Department
as 3:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. USA
as 5:2023cv01978
Petitioner:
Delamon A. Marshall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Ashley Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. U.S. Marshals
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
McKale Hill
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
