Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shue v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 1:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Shue
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shue v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 1:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Shue
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shue v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Shue
Defendant:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shue v. Hargett
as 14-8078
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN K. SHUE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARGETT, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institute
Shue v. Lampert, et al
as 14-8042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN K. SHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAMPERT, STEVE HARGETT, Warden and CARL VOIGTSBERGER
Shue v. Wyoming Medium Correctional Institute Warden et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Petitioner:
Marvin K Shue
Respondent:
Wyoming Medium Correctional Institute Warden and State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marvin Shue vs Robert Lampert et al
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Shue
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director , Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden , Robert O Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Shue v. Corizon Health Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Shue
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Grievance Manager, Shawn Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shue v. Laramie County Detention, et al
as 13-8064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN K. SHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LARAMIE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and SERGEANT PORTER, Laramie County Detention Center Deputy Sheriff, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
