Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
St. Charles County, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv01376
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
St. Charles County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00605
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jackson County, Missouri v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00571
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Housel v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05084
Defendant:
HD Development of Maryland, Inc. , CASCO Diversified Corporation and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edie Housel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. National Floral Supply of Maryland, Inc.
as 6:2014cv03162
Defendant:
National Floral Supply of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melissa James
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eoff v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01705
Plaintiff:
Abraham Eoff
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
